Can this be disproven?

Variforum proposes a mathematical mechanism for preventing permanent epistemic authority in AI-mediated systems.

We believe the K₀(z) decay kernel is robust. We do not believe it is perfect.

Use the auditor below to explore edge cases, attempt to construct counterexamples, or probe for structural flaws. The AI cites sources, acknowledges genuine critiques, and logs unresolved questions.

If you find a valid flaw, it will be added to the public log.

W(t) = min( K₀(α · Δt / T_ref), W_max )

K₀(z) Auditor

System Active

Auditor

I am the K₀(z) Framework Auditor. My purpose is to defend—and stress-test—the logic of temporal decay.

You can probe for inconsistencies, mathematical vulnerabilities, or practical edge cases. I'll acknowledge landing blows and add them to our public record of unresolved questions.

What part of the framework shall we challenge today?